Fiddl.art: Create, Share, and Sell Your AI Art

in Discovery-it2 days ago

IMG20230402115144.jpg


I'm sure you have all heard the saying "beauty is in the eye of the beholder". If you have never heard it, it is basically saying that different people like different things. As humans, we all place value in different things. Cryptocurrency is a perfect example of this. While those tokens may have great value to me, someone else might just see it as "fake Internet money".

Take the NFT craze of last cycle for example. People were snatching up things right and left. Many were just looking for a quick flip, that was the value they saw in the pieces. While others were more intrigued by the art aspect of it. For them, the value laid in what the artist had created. I'll be the first to admit, that latter category was definitely the minority.

AI is a pretty controversial subject these days.

While some see the value in it, others are not really that interested in it.

I get it, AI is a complex concept and construct that many of us seem to be rushing headlong into. I saw a meme the other day that went something like this:

I want AI that will do my dishes and fold my laundry so I can work on my art, not AI that creates art so I can do the dishes and fold my laundry.

It's a good point, but as a former English major in university, I have always argued that words are art too. Stringing the right combination of them together can touch the deepest nerve or emotion of a person. Likewise, finding the perfect combination that can create something that my hands could never hope to accomplish is also in my opinion an art form.

I know many would disagree with me. I respect that. I've had productive discussions with @tarazkp in the past about this. Despite what the world might lead you to believe these days, it's okay to disagree.

IMG20230402112622.jpg


Honestly though, this post isn't about whether or not AI art is right or wrong. Instead, the previous paragraphs are my way of introducing you to a new platform I discovered the other day. I'm sure like many of you, I get a copious amount of emails from different crypto projects. In fact, I created a separate email account just so I can keep them away from my main email account.

Some of them are scams, some are legit, some are spam, and other's actually catch my attention.

Fiddl.art is one of the few that got my attention.

Full disclosure, that is a referral link that I shared above

You might recall back in the day I was part of a community called BOID. While I still hold the tokens, and they have since moved chains, I am not as involved as I used to be. The basic idea was BOID leveraged the Folding@Home project to use your computers extra processing power to solve scientific problems like mapping cancer markers, or searching for extraterrestrial life.

Plus, while your computer was doing that, you were also mining the BOID token. Several members of the BOID team are now involved in Fiddl.art.

I kind of buried the lead there, but Fiddl.art is basically a social space where you can create, share, and promote your AI created art. Likewise you can upvote other people's art similar to how you upvote things here on HIVE.

Fiddl uses a currency called Fiddl points that you can purchase and then use to create pieces of "art" or vote and collect other artists pieces.

I had a quick discussion with one of the project leads the other day and I asked if they had plans to allow purchase of Fiddl Points with BOID. While that doesn't seem to be the case, he did mention that they plan on leveraging the BOID crowd sources processing model to supply the computational power required to generate all of the AI art.

I'm actually not sure how much I am going to play around with Fiddl. Although I can string some words together in a decent sentence, spending money to be able to turn my prompts into something visceral doesn't seem like the best use of my money.

On the other hand, I know several folks on HIVE have went all in on the AI art thing and they basically use it every day, so maybe this will appeal to one of them. I have created one piece of art so far. It took about six of my Fiddl Points and I'm honestly not super happy with how it turned out.

I'd definitely fine tune it a bit more if I felt like spending the platforms currency. That being said, I don't think it is an issue with the software they are using to generate the pieces. I think it has more to do with me needing to fine tune my prompt. Of course, each of those fine tunes takes a bit of currency to accomplish.

Fiddl.art is an interesting concept and while I might not use it every day, I can see it being something that others might find some value in.

After all, value is in the eye of the holder right?


Sports Talk Social - @bozz.sports


TEAMUSAhive_footer_bozz.jpg


All pictures/screenshots taken by myself or @mrsbozz unless otherwise sourced

Sort:  

I have mixed feelings about AI art, it can be handy when you want to create a quick faunny image to send in a chart or for a meme, but when people us it to create photo like images and share them as if they had taken them not so sure about that

and I maybe old school, when we had a scvhool project to write a piece about some historical period, or a review of a book, or any other writing project, we had to actuallt read and research and put our own words and thoughts into it

Seeign eople using Ai to do those sort of things for school projects, doesnt seem wrong to me as such but I do feel the students are cheatign themselves in that they are not learning anything just letting Ai do the thinking for them, so hence the ones they are cheating the most are themselves

!pimp

OHh an di know the post from your point was not about whether its right or wrong, and you also make a good point about its OK to disagree, sadly for so many these days they dont feel that way

Fiddle sounds cool but I barely keep up with twhat I do now so are resisting the urge to chekc it out


Your comment is upvoted by @topcomment
image.png

More info - Support @topcomment - Discord

I agree with a lot of what you say here. If I use anything that is AI generated, I usually source it. Even if it is just an image here on HIVE. I've started to move away from using them here though. The flip side to that is the fact that kids these days learn differently than we do. I see everyday teachers trying to use the old ways of teaching and they just don't click. If we can't adapt, then we are also doing the kids a disservice. I agree thought that they should do some of the research themselves. I think there is away teachers can create hybrid lessons that allow the students to do a little of both.

That's a whole different discussion though!

I'm sure you have a better idea of how it works for students than I do with your connections to the education system, it must be a challenge for the teachers also the Hybrid idea sounds greta but ust take some creativity from the teachers

Teachers are starting to leverage it as a tool as well. Whether or not it makes a difference, only time will tell! It's for sure a complex situation with many good points on both sides. It will likely take us several years to find a middle ground.

I'm a little dubious about 'AI' art. I see a lot posted on InLeo, but I'm not voting it up generally. I would rather support creative people who actually make art themselves. There's a lot of hype around this topic and it is hard to know where it is going. The technology will just improve. People are looking for ways to exploit it anyway.

NFTs were a big thing for a while, but I hear less about them now. I have bought some, but not paid a lot.

I think there are definitely some nefarious uses for AI art and it is only going to get worse. That concerns me for sure. The whole deep fake scene is just creepy. I think if you use an AI generated image for your post then that is one thing, but writing a whole post with AI stuff is another, though some users create some pretty amazing things, so those are fun to look at.

People need to be honest about it, but detection may get harder. I saw a post recently where they just used such crazy sentences that did not look human. I assume they used some tool for that.

Oh yeah, that isn't cool. In the past when I have used AI images I have been very up front about what they were and where they came from.

I’m not a fan of AI. Mainly because my industry. People can make their work look way better than it really is, which to me is a crime. Let you true work speak for itself.

That is a fair point. I'm not very creative besides writing, so I don't have first hand experience like that.

Interesting... AI art always has the controversy is it not yours, it the machine's. But that is pretty cool. I think it's great to use tools at your disposal to be creative, it doesn't bother me. Not sure I'm going to jump into Fidde.art either, but it is interesting!

I'm not sure it has the legs to make much of an impact, but I think it is an interesting way to test out the whole community social media thing. It's really not much different than something like Appics, but with AI art.

Ah the NFT hyped craze, I did of course get a few that I tried to flip.
But I also dubbed NFTs as .. No Fluffing Thanks

I am going to look at this in a wee while as I am sure someone was talking about something similar recently.

I went heavy into NFTs and got left holding some really worthless bags!

Congratulations @bozz! You received a personal badge!

Happy Hive Birthday! You are on the Hive blockchain for 7 years!

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking

Check out our last posts:

The 2024 Yearly Author Challenge is Over - Congrats to the Winners
Our Hive Power Delegations to the December PUM Winners