The Laws Of Information Technology And Deflation

in LeoFinance6 months ago

Prices always go up.

This is the belief that most have. Actually, with many things, this is the case. However, there is one field which tends to go unnoticed when it comes to a discussion like this. What is important is the fact that it is growing as a percentage of the overall economy.

What this means is the calls for hyperinflation are nonsensical. There is no way for that to happen when a growing percentage of your economy falls under the laws of information technology.

Before getting to the specifics, lets dive into what this is.

Laws of IT and Deflation

Historically, we can sum up the laws of IT by their different components.

We have:

When it comes to the individual aspects, we see a doubling with regards to cost/performance of 2 years, 3 years, and 6 years. This means we have an annual deflation rate of 50%, 33%, and 16%. The key is the last one, software, is moving at a faster pace.

In fact, we might be able to assign the same to semiconductors, at least looking at GPUs.

The point here is we have a massive amount of downward pressure as the tentacles of this expand.

There is another component to consider. Technology tends to push the price of things to either the zero or near-zero level. Here is where we see things that use to carry a cost suddenly become available at no charge.

An example of this is long distance phone service. Today, we can interact with people all over the world at zero marginal cost. Another is the idea of paying commission on stock trades. Since people were eliminated from the process, companies could offer the service for free.

One of the keys to this is we are seeing this expand. The Internet was a boom in that it really advanced the digital world. Online activity has operated under this premise for the last couple decades. However, we are seeing this move forward.

The Impact

Let us take a look at some examples of who this spreads.

It is one thing to think about software, but what about something unrelated. Let us look at televisions.

Here is what happened in that industry:

Then we have mobile phone service:

Audio/Video equipment:

Photography equipment:

None of these are online digital products. When you look at the list above, these are not things that immediately come to mind. Instead, they are real world products and services yet they still managed to see deflation over long periods of time.

This provides us with some insight into the future.

The Tentacles Are Spreading

Most do not factor in free.

For example, how many people, when discussing this topic, step back to think about what photos use to cost? Do think consider what it could take to get a set developed and to distribute to the family members?

The answer is no. Instead, they just snap photos on their phone and upload them to Instagram or whatever the preferred application is.

It is getting to the point where we do not even need to take the photo. We can have software generate it for us.

How is this a factor?

Let us consider the idea of music in films. There was a time, not long ago, when there were postings for jobs to create the music for a film. This could be everything from background music to jingles.

Those are all gone. Instead, those making films are simply having software spit out the music. This is something in the background that is not rivaling the quality of a chart topping song. Instead, we are dealing with a few chords that enhance the emotion being conveyed within a scene.

AI music seems to be good enough for this.

What does that do for the cost of the production? It has a way of decreasing it.

Obviously, this is not something major. But what happens when this spreads into healthcare, education, and construction? These are a few areas where we see massive price increases.

Much like overpopulation, the inflation equation has people looking in the wrong direction. Those who believe in a future of hyperinflation do not understand technology. When you have 7%-10% of the US economy under the laws of IT and another 10%-20% being affected by it, how is that even possible?

The answer is that, long term, it is not.


What Is Hive

Posted Using InLeo Alpha

Sort:  

I know we've discussed this before... but I really do think inflation is the most likely scenario in the coming years. I don't think the USA will see widespread hyperinflation or deflation.

Cell service might be lower in cost... but I would guess the average price for mobile devices is more expensive now than in 1997 and families spend more on communication technology now than in 1997. So yes, the technology is deflationary but companies have found ways to offer more to charge more. I'd also guess that telecommunication companies are making more profit now than in 1997.

Is making a movie cheaper now than 20 years ago or do they take those cost savings and spend it elsewhere? Furiosa cost 168 million to make. Mad Max cost 350,000 USD to make in 1979 ($1.6M today). The value of streaming services is incredible in comparison, but with so much content being split amongst different services, most families are probably spending just as much as cable. Movie theatre tickets aren't cheaper today.

I would say in most cases, the deflationary aspect of technology just means more profit and will not affect inflation.

I really don't think the use of AI in healthcare, education and construction will see lower, better prices for consumers. If anything, large companies will invest heavily in AI and push out smaller companies to make a strong monopoly for themselves... contributing to higher inflation.

I would absolutely love to be wrong... truly.

but I really do think inflation is the most likely scenario in the coming years.

Depends upon what period you are discussing. Overall, certainly, in the next 5 years you will might not see much difference from the historical norm.

But when we look at technological deflation, it is penetrating throughout more of the industry.

but I would guess the average price for mobile devices is more expensive now than in 1997

So you are trying to compare a smartphone? Even still, the answer is no. This compares high end phones. There are obviously non Samsung and Apple phones that are much cheaper. My latest phone costs about $220.

families spend more on communication technology now than in 1997. So yes, the technology is deflationary but companies have found ways to offer more to charge more.

How so? The data reflects the costs of those services are going down. So what are you talking about in particular?

Of course, technology will eliminate the labor factor. It is why companies can offer stock trades for free. There are no people involved in the transaction anymore. The brokers are gone since we do the trade online and the traders on the floor of the exchanges were automated.

Your phone might be $220, but I'd say on average people are spending just as much on devices as in the late 90s. Even with your graph you can see the iPhone X is about the same price as the Motorola and Nokia. Obviously the iPhone X can do way, way, way more than those phones and has significantly better hardware and features... but my point is that normal people aren't seeing those technological deflationary savings because companies find a way to keep prices high... which helps inflation.

At the moment my household pays $95 a month for cell service through Verizon. This is the cheapest package they offer. We're in an area where we can only get Verizon. AT&T and T-Mobile don't provide coverage here. So even though the costs of individual calls is cheaper, data is cheaper, I don't think people on average aren't paying significantly less than they were in the late 90s. The prices haven't been deflationary even if the cost of the technology has been.

Sure... stock trading has reduced in cost... but so many more things are more expensive than they were.. housing, education, healthcare, cost of living, etc. I'm finding it hard to think that these things will be dramatically cheaper in 10 years. They'll surely be more profitable, absolutely, but they won't be cheaper.

Loading...

Is making a movie cheaper now than 20 years ago or do they take those cost savings and spend it elsewhere? Furiosa cost 168 million to make. Mad Max cost 350,000 USD to make in 1979 ($1.6M today). The value of streaming services is incredible in comparison, but with so much content being split amongst different services, most families are probably spending just as much as cable. Movie theatre tickets aren't cheaper today.

Feature length films are more expensive. Hell the character actors (not even the main star) gets more money for a film than the 1979 movies.

But does a computer generated film on YouTube that people put together cost the same? Not even close. It is a lot less than $1.6 million.

Sure... but do people care about computer generated films on YouTube? People watch movies for the stories and characters that resonate with them... it's hard to believe AI will be able to accomplish that.

Who is the number on streaming service? YouTube. So there is obviously a lot of content (and hours being pulled away from movie studios and television networks).

People watch movies for the stories and characters that resonate with them... it's hard to believe AI will be able to accomplish that.

It seems based upon the numbers, Hollywood is failing at this. Hence, doesnt it come down to who is prompting the tools that generate the output, regardless of where/how it is created.

This is very educational. With AI, more things should become less expensive or even free. Some are already using it as a helper in programming, learning a new language, editing, and all around assistance.

It already has. Consider the fact that information use to have a cost to it. Now, you can pay for it but it is mostly free.

Honestly Ai has made a huge impact in the world, especially in the tech world 🌎
Make things easier for mankind,

Quite so much that the world of information and technology has really changed for us that most of the time we always underate. Well this comes with a price and that id the deflating

We overlook how things change over time.

I adore the stuff you post It cleverly provides an insightful and approachable explanation of difficult economic ideas as well as the deflationary effects of technology. Continue your fantastic effort!

As more economic sectors are subject to IT regulations, cutting costs and boosting productivity across a range of businesses, technological developments drive deflation and lessen the likelihood of hyperinflation.