In my world of IMAGINATION, where I get to see uncountable babies crawling here and there in laughter and smile, some running and staggering up and down in a happy mood because they have no worries and they are in a beautiful place with no fear of insecurity or hunger and they are so so happy.

Suddenly, two unseen hands picked one, two, three or four babies depending on the strength from the unseen hands and luck and dragged them out of their joyful peers, terminating the joy they have been experiencing and the togetherness with their friends. At the end of the day, it was discovered that these two hands were not ready for the baby(s) they dragged and then decided to return the baby(s) violently. I IMAGINE IT TO BE A SAD EXPERIENCE because that's a murder and assassination.
Abortion should not be the go-to means just because couples are not ready to have a baby. There are other measures that has been put into place medically to avoid getting pregnant when a couple is not ready for parental responsibility or better still Abstain from sexual activity.
There's provision for family planning of different kinds which helps couples plan the years they want to spend together without having kids, or the interval they want between the birth of their children if they decide to have more than 1 or 2.
In fact, there are situations whereby the couples needs to have a baby since they have none but due to the wife's critical health, she's advised medically not to try getting pregnant or having a baby. So such people tend to take the family planning method seriously.

BUT In this case of talking about ABORTION for this prompt, let's say unfortunately, the last instance of a critical health wife accidentally got pregnant, is ABORTION right and does the father have a say in getting the abortion or not?
This is actually a very complicated instance and issue because it isn't just about not wanting the baby but the baby is a necessity but just not necessary at that time due to the carrier's health. I think medically, abortion is legally acceptable for these kind of situations if I'm not totally wrong. What's the life of the baby gonna tell when the mother is at risk of losing her life in the process
Fathers or proposed fathers should and must have a say when it comes to having an abortion, no matter what the circumstances around the pregnancy may be.
To be Noted Having a say is not in the sense of calling for abortion because he is running from fatherly responsibility o.
Both couple are the drivers of the pregnancy even if the wife will be the carrier and has the primary body of going through the diverse changes that the pregnancy brings but in issues like abortion, he should be able to have a say because you can't decide to kill the child he's supposed to be a father on because you decided to.

Most especially in the cases of the last instance I gave in the 5th paragraph.
There are movies I've seen whereby wives in this case get to insist on carrying the baby just to have an offspring after her and the husbands get to argue with such decision to never occur but rather go for abortion.
Issues like this in marriage can only be sort with thorough communication and that's why both responsible parties must be involved in the decision making and not just 1 of them.
The most important thing and the best thing is that, when couples realizes that they are not yet ready, they can always ABSTAIN, PROTECT themselves using CDs or go for FAMILY PLANNING instead of taking Abortion as the escape route and endangering the other party's life or activating the possibility of not getting pregnant again. Worse fact is that MEN'S LIFE GOES ON.
I'll be dropping my 🖊️ here on the Hive Learners community prompt
Thanks for reading through 🤗
All images are generated using Meta AI

