I'd just stick with LEO. Let's all remember how CUB ended...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Trending
Would your opinion change if we (LBI) got a seat on the board of Leostrategy as part of any deal? That would put us inside the project and able to have a direct say on how it operates. Plus the good PR for LBI and LSTR.
I honestly don't even know what leostrategy is. It sounds made up... I don't care, if I could run it better I would be doing it myself. I just know new and shiny has burned people in the past.
I have a firm proposal to put to LBI holders. Need to run a governance vote. How would you suggest it gets run - using the old rules from the original LBI governance set up? Or some other method - 1 LBI 1 vote?
Anyway, I'm keen for some help to run the vote if you would be able. Plus I can tell you are not really on board with the idea, so you helping me with the vote adds some impartiality to the process.