I think you do already openly elicit feedback from people. However, if you intend to make it a shareholder-based decisionmaking process, then you'd likely have to use a similar model of weighted decisions that you're currently using to see who gets priority votes, etc. Essentially, a summation of all staked CCD, liquidity pools, and voted posts.

Now, the one problem here is that this can greatly benefit a wealthy stakeholder, while leaving behind the opinions of people with less funds behind. Now, if you want it to more equal, then it can't really be considered as much of a stakeholder decision, and instead you'd simply continue running it as you are now. Maybe by giving stakeholders more power, you'd have more people interested in buying up CCD - but you'd have to make them happy, just like any CEO that answers to their chairpeople. So you'd have to weigh the risks and benefits of both approaches here.