Oh yes, long... I will use your feedback... You are absolutely right with the length... And I am interested that I offer a nice to consume way. Maybe a long text cen be compensated with quality, but it stays a long text where other jump away from it in the middle - and then I don't reach my coal to say what I would like to say. A good cliffhanger would be much better! And When I think about: (sure we always have to ensure our articles are good to engage the reader for a later visit again, but) when we think about that in a smaller scale: "What is the reason the reader is hyped from part 1 and why he like to come back to part 2?" This thoughts only can improve actions (when we want to tak it like this... Others would just think "Okay, I split my content and earn twice/double on the same thing behind). No, really, when we think a little about, we could create a lot of positive things out of splitting a long article into two or three parts.

Very good feedback and reflections you triggered, Josiva; thank you for that! And that you used your time to write me! Metaphoric and a little more than what I like to say, but: It is one thing to throw a coin into the cup of a homeless guy; but another thig to sit down on the ground with him for 4 minutes and spend the time, sharing the same level (because of this, sitting down to him, instead of standing and looking down) and integrate him on a very normal level.

Damn... And now I wrote a long comment too... I am ill... (Really! Next posting is about that I am ill...)

Josivaldo, thanks again & HIve a great day! See you later!