Open AI is gradually becoming a money business

in Cent5 months ago


source

OpenAI will find itself on an electric journey in 2024 and probably in 2025 as well. On one hand, they see huge growth, with $2.7 billion just going to ChatGPT and a total revenue of $3.7 billion for the year, why am I not surprised , hahah. But the kicker this year is that they expect an unbelievable $5 billion loss. How? Well, just lean heavily on Microsoft cloud services for computing power, and you then get creative with your bills, the numbers add up and I'm shocked it ain't more than this.

Regardless, momentum keeps building for the company. Just a couple of months ago, in August 2024, their revenue was up to $300 million a month, and thisnof course I got from websites online, just search it on Google. This I think is a huge upward leap from earlier in the year. Their upper brass is confident this growth is poised for more expansion, with estimates of $11.6 billion in revenue by 2025, skyrocketing their goal to very bizarre-high numbers of $100 billion by 2029. Ambitious, right?

A plan they seem to be riding on is their ChatGPT subscription hike. So, if you're one of those collars forking over $20 per month at the moment, hold your horses because, by the end of the year, that might go up to $22, while in five years, you might be seeing $44 on your bill. Not a small price for gpt, it better be useful enough to make people more otherwise they ain't getting people involved, but the company seems sure users will stay around.

And they are ramping up for a great fundraising campaign, expecting to pull in $7 billion, sending the company's valuation way to the top at $150 billion. And with players like Tiger Global and Thrive Capital prowling the waters, they could pull this off. If they don't pull this off, at least what they'll manage to take will be close. It's no surprise because AI is a big money business.

Interestingly, the evolution of OpenAI from a non-profit to a for-profit business is stirring suspicions internally. Their CTO recently quit, and they were said to be actively sharing a 7 percent equity stake with Sam Altman. Some of these changes give rise to hints of a larger rethink in strategy at the company, but they remain absolutely dedicated to their core efforts in AI.

I personally think if you make AI too expensive at the beginning, many will be discouraged for using it and perhaps, some company somewhere will manage to do the same job but for free and grab all the users because only few want to pay for apps, websites and online digital assets.

Sort:  

It was about money right from the very beginning

Yes, that's also what I think... I guess they've seen that the time is now right to really cash in big time...

Thanks for the lovely comment brother ! LUV !HUG

Estamos hablando de mucho dinero 300.000 millones mensual x 12 meses del año = 3.600.000.000.000, eso es 10 veces más que el dinero acumulado de Cristiano Ronaldo como capital neto "300.000.000.000"

Es muy enfermiza la cantidad de dinero, no es de sorprender que para los próximos años esperen tener mucho más ingresos, la gente no se va a retirar, después de todo la IA es la revolución del nuevo mundo "será indispensable"

You're absolutely right my brother, it'll get seriously big and might probably end up as the biggest company of AI for a long ti

There are all kinds of ways a company can be pulling in huge revenues and still make a loss. No profits means no tax to pay (well, apart from things like VAT and employment taxes), and a multinational corporation has the advantage over smaller businesses that it can cross-charge costs internally to move profits to the lowest tax jurisdictions.

Wait for real.... Crossing charge -cost 🤔🤔🤔 this is a pretty brilliant move.... I'm thinking most of the companies do this

The multinationals definitely all do it. When a company as big as Amazon turns round to the Turks & Caicos Islands or Luxembourg (a country so small they could re-carpet it for a tenner - it's cute, I've been there 😆), the company's profits are more than the country's GPD. They can ask for special tax rates and get them.

Then Amazon Luxembourg charges a "management fee" to (for example) Amazon UK that just happens to match the UK subsidiary's profit. So no tax paid in the UK (where the Corporation tax rate is 25%), and a special rate (often zero) paid on those profits now they've been moved to Luxembourg.

For smaller businesses, it often isn't worth the cost to set up the company structure and pay the expensive accountants to make it all work seamlessly.

My goodness what a smart strategy, it'll save millions 😳😳😳

Congratulations @theringmaster! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You have been a buzzy bee and published a post every day of the week.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out our last posts:

Be ready for the October edition of the Hive Power Up Month!
Hive Power Up Day - October 1st 2024

Thanks @hivebuzz busy bee all the way 👑

You're welcome @theringmaster, it's well deserved! Congrats on your constant involvement on Hive 😊👍

Thank you so much @hivebuzz you're the absolute best

Thank you @theringmaster 😊

You're always welcome