You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Web 3.0 in Disaster Response

in Cent5 months ago

I can see Web 3 being useful after the initial shock to fund-raise, and to facilitate local peer-to-peer transactions if the banking system has fallen over.

But until we've got mass adoption to match or exceed Facebook and Twitter, those legacy Web 2 social media platforms will probably be the best way to reconnect people, to find out who survived and who didn't.

In terms of communication in the immediate aftermath, it still fails for the same reason legacy systems fail; no power and no mobile phone masts.

The best solution I've seen so far was after the Maui disaster, where enough local people had Starlink to get satellite internet access and used solar panels and battery swapping to keep enough mobile phones going. It seems the local government wanted to impose centralised disaster response and stop people communicating independently, and were told where to go....

Sort:  

The Star link is also very very great brother you're right on all the challenges we still face but for worth it's Worth after Web 3.0 advances to be more scalable it would beat Web 3 platforms hands down in situations like this. From faster fund raised to security in ensuring resources get there safely.... I'm so happy and honored to see you comment my blog man.. thank you.. !WINE