Hello @theinkwell, first of all, thank you for writing…

This time, I will respond with all the respect this community deserves, and I will do so with the certainty of what I do and how I do it. This is the second time I've been accused of using AI, and I believe there are certain inconsistencies in your curation practices. I hope you take this with the respect and seriousness with which you did.

The first time, I didn't have the tools to refute the accusation because I was completely unfamiliar with AI management and because I was writing directly in the Ecency front end. But it helped me take the necessary measures in case it happened again. And well, I didn't have to wait long; here we are again.

After going through the first instance with you, I decided to learn how to use three AI recognition tools. Every article I write, I take the time to run it through each of these tools, and believe me, this time was no exception.

Likewise, every article I write is written in Microsoft Word and saved in a folder along with all the other articles I write.

So there's no doubt about what I'm saying, I'm accompanying this response with screenshots taken moments before responding to you, because, my dear friends, I do make sure I'm certain of what I'm going to say before pointing it out.

On the other hand, as a user with experience working on curation teams, I know that the sole responsibility for this falls on the curator, who obviously falls under the umbrella of the community. Therefore, I humbly recommend that you be a little more careful when choosing your team members.

Because situations like these demotivate and alienate people who truly want to be part of a community that supports us, that encourages us, and that NEVER EVER exposes us to public ridicule.

Without further ado, I'll sign off, but not before making it very clear that this story will be my last post in your community.

Thank you very much… ;)