looking at the list again, I had the same feeling...despite that any statistician would slap us in making assumptions with such low numbers! But the trend with these users looks like more organic, I agree.
you mean post comments upvoted by inleo?
you can do that for sure...having a list of users with comments highly curated,just the details if there was specific curator(s) pushing the button wont be possible, unless there is a list somewhere :P
Yes - comments (or threads) upvoted by Inleo. There's hardly any list, you'd have to list them based on "being upvoted with certain VP" AND "being a comment / not being a root post", if it makes any sense.
nice challenge, I am starting to play with!! it is a more deep dig for sure! I will post with some printscreens later as a reply =)
I can give some preliminary things, the vote calculation in $ is bugged so I am not posting for now lol . So just clarification those are only votes on threads! leo.voter curation in threads from inleo :P
I was wrong... most of jimmy.adams votes are 1% lol so it isn't so high...take a look in this new top20 by leo.voter threads
That's actually quite something though. If these are on "good mornings" and such.
we can do other paremeter then! count characters in these comments ? hehehehe
yeah... so i have access to the weight of each vote... the calculation bugged a bit I guess lol also I am taking the account of the current 100% inleo vote which is around 35$
it gave some crazy numbers hehehe but you can estipulate for example, if jimmy got at least an 8% vote we are talking of 2.8$ per vote so we could say that he got at least 344$ just by threading :P