Goldman Sachs Entering The Cyrpto Game And What It Means

in LeoFinance8 months ago

▶️ Watch on 3Speak


Goldman is looking to access crypto, at least through Blackrock's ETF. Of course, when it comes to the banks, we have to be careful. They are always doing stuff behind the scenese, off balance sheet.

In this video I discuss how, while this is not great for the values crypto espoused, it is a nice layer of protection against the political establishment. Goldman is also known as "Government" Sachs. Even Gary Gensler is a Goldman alum. If money is being made by these banks, they are not going to easily give up the Golden Goose because politicians want to throw their weight around.


▶️ 3Speak

Sort:  

I guess I misread an article I read before, since I thought that they were already involved in crypto in some way. By the way you put it, it seems I can consider them as a necessary evil to protect crypto against too much meddling of the government.

Summary:

The host discusses Goldman Sachs' entry into the cryptocurrency market, analyzing the implications and potential impact on the broader crypto ecosystem. Key points:

  • Goldman Sachs, a major Wall Street investment bank, is looking to get involved in crypto through BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF. This represents another significant validation of crypto from a major financial institution.

  • The host examines the "government tax" phenomenon, where many former Goldman Sachs employees have taken up influential positions in government agencies like the Treasury, SEC, and Federal Reserve. This raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and the ability of the government to regulate crypto.

  • The host believes that the approval of Bitcoin and potentially Ethereum ETFs will lead to Wall Street further layering various crypto-related products and derivatives. This could drive up the prices of these assets, even if it diminishes decentralization.

  • The host argues that while the government could theoretically ban crypto, the involvement of powerful entities like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs makes this unlikely, as they have a vested interest in the growth of the crypto market and the associated revenue streams.

Detailed Analysis:

The host begins by discussing Goldman Sachs' entry into the cryptocurrency market, noting that the investment bank is looking to provide its clients with exposure to Bitcoin through BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF. He highlights the "two-tiered" nature of the banking system, where certain activities and investments are publicly disclosed, while others remain opaque.

The host then delves into the "government tax" phenomenon, where many former Goldman Sachs employees have taken up influential positions in various government agencies, such as the Treasury, SEC, and Federal Reserve. He suggests that this incestuous relationship between Wall Street and the government raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the ability of the government to effectively regulate the crypto industry.

The host argues that the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, despite the SEC's initial resistance, is a significant validation of crypto from Wall Street. He believes that this is just the beginning, as Wall Street will likely continue to layer various crypto-related products and derivatives, which could drive up the prices of these assets, even if it diminishes the decentralization of the underlying networks.

The host acknowledges that, at its core, crypto is a decentralized technology that cannot be easily stopped by the government. However, he suggests that the government could still make life difficult for the crypto industry through various regulatory measures. The host believes that the involvement of powerful entities like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs, who have a vested interest in the growth of the crypto market, makes it unlikely that the government will take drastic actions to ban or severely restrict crypto.

The host concludes by stating that the increasing involvement of Wall Street in the crypto space, while not necessarily beneficial for decentralization, could make it more difficult for the government to take actions that would significantly undermine the crypto ecosystem, as these institutions have the resources and influence to defend their interests.