We are seeing some very powerful advanced technologies being created. Many are espousing about the potential threat.
In this video I take on the question of whether we should dive right in, or should we try to slow things down?
▶️ 3Speak
Sort: Trending
Congratulations @taskmaster4450! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
 | You received more than 214000 HP as payout for your posts, comments and curation. Your next payout target is 216000 HP. The unit is Hive Power equivalent because post and comment rewards can be split into HP and HBD |
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP
I think the creation of powerful advanced technologies are inevitable, and more will continue to come out. This is the expected outcome when both software and hardware are improving at great speed. I don't think we need to slow things down, but we do need to be careful and monitor the progress to make sure we have control at all times. The last thing we want is Skynet becoming a reality.
Summary:
The host discusses the choice between fully embracing or taking a measured approach to the ongoing development of technology, AI, and other emerging innovations. He acknowledges the potential threats posed by these advancements, drawing parallels to past concerns over nuclear weapons and biological/chemical weapons. However, he argues that the "AI genie" cannot be put back in the box, as the pace of AI development is not going to slow down.
The host believes that even if the West tries to restrict AI, other countries and private companies will continue to push the technology forward in an "arms race" scenario. He suggests that the only viable option is to fully embrace these advancements and work to steer them in a more utopian direction, rather than a dystopian one. The host dismisses the "Skynet" scenario of a single centralized AI system, arguing that the proliferation of multiple companies and systems reduces that risk.
Overall, the host advocates for a proactive and optimistic approach to technological progress, as he sees no realistic alternative to the continued advancement of AI and related technologies. His view is that the best path forward is to get these innovations out into the world as quickly as possible, in order to build resilience and prevent any single entity from dominating the landscape.
Detailed Analysis:
The host begins by acknowledging the potential threats posed by emerging technologies, referencing past concerns over nuclear weapons, biological/chemical weapons, and the more recent COVID-19 pandemic. He notes that while these threats have not yet led to the eradication of humanity, the possibility remains.
The host then turns his attention to the specific case of artificial intelligence, questioning whether it truly fits into the same category of existential threats. He cites examples of past technological alarmism, such as the Y2K scare and concerns over climate change, that ultimately proved to be overblown. The host suggests that the Turing test has already been passed, with AI systems capable of engaging in human-like interactions without being detected.
However, the host acknowledges that the real concern is not a single, sentient AI system, but rather the proliferation of algorithms and intelligent systems embedded throughout the digital landscape. He points to the influence of algorithms on social media, e-commerce platforms, and various other online services, arguing that these systems often operate in their own interests rather than for the benefit of humanity.
The host argues that the only way to truly eliminate this threat would be to get rid of the internet entirely, which is not a realistic or desirable option. He suggests that the advancement of these technologies is inevitable, driven by an "arms race" mentality among private companies and nations, similar to the nuclear arms race of the past.
Given this reality, the host believes that the best approach is to fully embrace and accelerate the development of AI and related technologies, with the goal of shaping them in a more positive direction. He acknowledges that a utopian outcome is unlikely, but argues that a proactive, "all-in" approach is necessary to prevent a more dystopian scenario.
The host dismisses the idea of a "Skynet" scenario, where a single, centralized AI system poses an existential threat. Instead, he envisions a future where multiple companies and systems are constantly competing and evolving, reducing the risk of any one entity gaining too much control.
Ultimately, the host's position is that there is no realistic alternative to the continued advancement of AI and related technologies. He believes that the only viable path forward is to fully embrace these innovations, work to steer them in a more positive direction, and build resilience through the proliferation of multiple, competing systems.