Did you ever consider think about Hive as a system for archiving the Internet. We see different initiatives that are doing this, all in a centralized manner.
In this video I discuss how Hive could become a database for the Internet, at least part of it, and have information that immutable on it. This would eliminate the ability to change things after the fact.
▶️ 3Speak
that's why truth has to be recorded on hive, meaning subjective witnessing; people describing what they saw so others can learn from it.
swarm intelligence, rather than herd mentality.
we can hack all sorts of problems this way, with the right connections in a larger tribe of many tribes that we ourselves choose, rather than have some editor choose it for us. people choose their own tribes as sovereign minds.
it lets people suddenly be allies who would have never met (face to face). and find out things and also record those. it is the scientific method materialized.
everybody has a piece of the puzzle that may be worth sharing, whatever their field of interest.
and stored and available for others in the future to learn from it...
decentralized knowledge storage and therefore:
more human awareness.
win
On a very limited basis, I’m already doing this with my #oddsandends posts. Granted, just snippets of articles, rather than the full text of articles.
But the Internet Wayback Machine has repeatedly run into storage barriers, more than once begging for money for hardware. Here, something like the SpeakNetwork’s distributed storage might help. But for Hive, how much data could the blockchain itself handle?
Right now, we’re nowhere near filling up blocks. But with a lot of archiving the internet, that would become a real issue. Of course, the core devs might at some point increase the amount of data a block could contain and/or significantly reduce the 3-second threshold.
There have been a lot of leaders that tried/tries to change how their family has/is portrayed in history. Some are using misinformation to confuse people for elections. Even in the media there are woke or revisionist propaganda being shown.
archivedotorg does just that having a repository of data stored on its website.
Summary:
The host discusses the potential for Hive, a decentralized blockchain, to serve as an archival system for preserving online content and information. He highlights the issue of centralized control over web content, where entities can easily remove or alter information on their platforms. This raises concerns about the rewriting of history and the loss of valuable data.
The host suggests that Hive could be used to store text-based content, such as news articles, blog posts, and other online publications, providing a decentralized and immutable record of this information. This could help prevent the disappearance or alteration of content, even if the original source is taken down or modified.
The host also suggests that this archival system on Hive could be beneficial for feeding AI systems, as the data would be readily available on the blockchain. While some entities may have issues with this, the host argues that the changing nature of the internet and the need for preserving information outweigh these concerns.
Detailed Analysis:
The host begins by discussing the various initiatives that exist to archive web content, such as the Wayback Machine, which aim to preserve information that may be lost due to the centralized nature of the internet. He highlights the issue of centralized control, where information on websites can be taken down or altered by the entities that own them, regardless of whether it's a major news outlet or an individual blog.
The host then proposes the idea of using Hive, a decentralized blockchain, as an archival system for this type of content. He explains that Hive has the capability to store text-based data, which could include articles from various news sources, such as the New York Times, BBC, CNBC, and Bloomberg, covering important events like the Russian invasion of Ukraine or the IPO of a company.
The host emphasizes the importance of preserving this information, as it can be subject to rewriting or removal by the entities that originally published it. He provides examples of how individuals and organizations have been known to delete or alter their online presence, such as politicians deleting tweets or governments and corporations denying their actions until they are caught.
The host also discusses the concept of a "digital footprint" and the potential for platforms like WordPress or Medium to take down blogs or other content, potentially erasing valuable information. He cites the example of the debate around a certain drug treatment for COVID-19, where information was heavily censored on social media, only for the FDA to later backtrack on its stance.
The host argues that Hive could serve as a valuable archival system, providing an immutable record of this information and making it available to anyone, including AI systems that could utilize the data. While some entities may have issues with this, the host suggests that the changing nature of the internet and the need to preserve information outweigh these concerns.
Overall, the host presents a compelling case for Hive to be used as an archival system, highlighting the importance of preserving online content and the potential benefits of having a decentralized and immutable record of information.