You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Indiaunited - Weekly LEO Delegation Report till 10-12-2025

in LeoFinance8 months ago

Delegating alone doesn't directly give people higher votes. Only if people are manually curated, they get a higher vote. If that's your problem, we can get that additional perk removed from the curation. We know about your contributions in POSH, engagement, and curation efforts. It is not that your curators alone do a selfless job; we have a similar set of curators in our community as well, doing selfless jobs. At least you pay them from the reward pool through some mechanism. We don't even do that.

I've asked you many times to reconsider these layer 2 token delegation reports

We don't understand how 2 is many. This is the second time you are mentioning this as a problem, and that too with proper words. So far, the message was only conveyed through downvotes, which is why the message was not clear to the community. If LEO or any Layer 2 token update is your issue, and the weekly $1-$2 earnings from that post are your concern, then we can definitely stop posting that content. The small reward we earned on those posts helped us pay the server bills.

In the future, it will be nice and helpful if communications with the community or some representatives of the community are made before directly attacking them. We are not your enemies, and we don't have to attack each other. We have also been here for over 7 years on this chain and are trying our puny efforts for community building.

You may be doing big, big things for Hive, but we are a very small community trying to build with our small capacity. The market is already reducing the motivation for many people, and if elephants keep stamping on the small ants who are trying to build a small colony, the remaining motivation will also be gone. We don't need support from elephants, which we never had; it will be helpful at least if the stamping is not happening. Thanks for understanding.

Sort:  

If these things are left unchecked and properly not conveyed how serious of an issue they are, they'll grow uncontrollably all over the ecosystem to continously damage it. If it's not too much rewards then please don't accept them on such posts, it's easy to forfeit them through beneficiaries.

Manual curators being picky about who gets bigger upvotes based on self-interest is the same as autovoting people if they're delegating your way or holding some tokens of yours. Using layer 1 curation to prop up the value of layer 2 tokens is against hive curation, I know you're not excessive in that regard but it's still unfair towards other curation projects and stakeholders that focus on everything else that should be important in curation rather than self-interest.

Thanks for the detailed explanation, but as mentioned in the previous comment, we are okay to remove the additional perk we were giving. We will adjust our curation bot accordingly.

Would you be kind enough to remove the downvote from our contest post? As you can see, we have a good engagement on that post, and many people are participating. Even though nobody is supporting such efforts, the creator of the contest himself is spending some Hive from his pocket to reward the winners. We also use the community account to manually reward some of the contest posts.

Edit: Looks like the contest post was already paid out.

If you're worried about income to keep maintaining and hosting things just take a cut from delegations. Why would you deserve to collect author rewards for that to outcompete others in terms of returns.

You see how sleezy most of your practices are, right?

Still, it is hard to understand how your practices of using author rewards for building the POSH concept are not sleezy, but a puny 1$ - 2$ revenue for our bot upkeep is sleezy, and how funny it is that you think we are outcompeting others in terms of returns. If we were just doing that, we would have several million delegations coming to us.

Please try to understand that we are not your competitors or enemies. We are a small community on Hive, and we don't appreciate being destroyed.

You say you offer 100% delegation returns but then complain about not being able to pay for hosting so you have to accept author reward on shittoken delegation reports.

I'm getting tired of this nonsense, if you're acting dumb on purpose then please continue to this fascade.

We have already stopped the 20 percent additional perk and stopped the LEO curation because you hate LEO so much. We have conveyed that already in previous comments. You are still attacking us, and the intentions are unclear. Now we don't know who is acting dumb on purpose. You have been talking about the same things again and again, cleverly dodging the questions about your abuse of this system.

Let's talk about your POSH, ZING, or other projects where you use the reward pool to fund your projects with the help of self-votes. Can you deny the fact that you have built your empire on Hive with the help of the reward pool and self-votes? If using author rewards for bot upkeep is an abuse, who said it is allowed to use the same author rewards to fund all your projects? Not all people are fortunate enough to receive 400k delegations to build an empire on Hive and target small communities, ultimately destroying them.

If the second-layer token is your problem, you have also been doing the same thing. You have a similar delegation scheme for your ZING token, and you have been funding your project entirely using the self-upvotes from all your alt accounts. Is that not an abuse of the reward pool? Are you trying to prove to the world that your OCD alone is the best curation project in the world, with over 85% of the self-votes, and that no other curation projects should exist on Hive?

https://peakd.com/@poshtoken/posts

You have been doing this abuse for years now, and that's how you have grown bigger on Hive.

Many people in our community had great respect for you, which is now lost due to this continuous, unintentional attack.

Alright keep it up.

 8 months ago Reveal Comment
Loading...
 8 months ago Reveal Comment
Loading...
 8 months ago Reveal Comment
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...