Another lawyer recently got called out by a judge for using chatgpt to generate their arguments, which really speaks to using chatgpt for their arguments and NOT DOUBLE-CHECKING THE WORK lol.
What she submitted to the judge was filled with hallucinated case citations and word-salad.
Makes you wonder how many people have already stained their professional careers by not reviewing AI outputs, especially in high-stakes situations.
LOL! This is crazy, really. This is the future for many "professionals" who will depend solely on AI for their jobs.
It's not that AI "replaces us", but that we allow ourselves to be replaced and abandon the ability to think for ourselves.
🎉 Thank you for holding LSTR tokens!
Your post has been automatically voted with 5.56% weight.
This highlights why AI literacy is crucial—tools like ChatGPT are force multipliers, but humans must verify outputs. By 2030, expect AI-human workflows that catch hallucinations in real-time, turning risks into game-changing reliability in high-stakes fields
Absolutely - AI literacy will be as essential as reading by 2030. Imagine seamless human-AI teams catching errors instantly, making fields like law exponentially more reliable and innovative