Between Oaths And Ethics.

in Hive Learners2 days ago

Thinking about this, this topic brings to thought some difficult choices that medical professionals are sometimes faced with. I heard a story about a doctor who relieved his patient of the pain she was going through ,okay heres how the story went according to my friend.

He had a friend who goes by the name of Dr. Seun. A man of integrity. Since the day he swore his Hippocratic oath. He stood true to it and did the right thing. But life has a way of bringing difficult choices that eventually changes one's life in ways you didn't expect.and making that decision will be the hardest thing you'd ever do.

Source

It so happened that this fateful day eventually came for this upright Dr, Seun. If he was told that he would make the ultimate decision he wouldn't believe it. He went to work like every other day, did his rounds and check ups, attended to the little emergencies and was preparing to take a rest in his office that was when he was summoned to the emergency ward.

His patient, a young single mother had been diagnosed with some sort of rare form of cancer. She had been receiving treatment from different health care centres but her condition worsened day by day. He was moved to pity because he saw that her only daughter was always praying and in tears for her mother. He never allowed emotions to form when he was at work but this was more than he could handle. The woman's daughter was in pain more than the woman because she didn't know whether her mother would survive or not.

So Despite the best efforts of the medical team, The woman's condition worsened rapidly, leaving her in excruciating pain and with only days to live, it was so sad for him to see both mother and daughter going through so much pain together.

He sorted for ways to ease her suffering, Dr Seun had explored every possible treatment option, but to no avail, which even made him more useless in the situation, he knew she was going to die.
The woman pleaded with him to help her end the suffering in any way possible.And this was against the hospital's ethics and also the hospital committee had refused to approve euthanasia, citing the need to preserve human life at all costs.

As this Doctor sat by her bedside, watching the woman's eyes plead for relief, he didn't know what to do but he knew he had to do something He remembered the words of his medical school professor: "A doctor's duty is not only to prolong life but also to alleviate suffering."

With a heavy heart, He then made the decision to administer a lethal dose of morphine to her, knowing it would end this woman’s life but also bring an end to her unbearable pain.In the morning,when the hospital staff discovered the woman's lifeless body, they knew it was Dr Seun doings and so he was arrested and charged with murder.

At the courtroom , Dr Sean's defense team argued that his actions were justified, citing the principle of double effect. They claimed that Dr. Seun's intention was not to kill her but to alleviate her suffering, and that the death was an unfortunate but necessary consequence.

But the prosecution, however, weren't having it they said that Dr Seun had crossed a moral and legal boundary, and that his actions were nothing short of premeditated murder.The jury delivered verdict of him being guilty but with a recommendation for leniency. The judge sentenced Dr Seun to five years' probation, citing the exceptional circumstances of the case.

My Thoughts on this

To me I feel the doctor made an understandable choice, though I wrestle with whether it was right. He violated protocol by giving that dose to the patient, but seeing someone suffer terribly changes your perspective. The patient was clearly in agony, with no chance of recovery, so perhaps hastening the inevitable was merciful.

Source

The medical board's five years suspension seems too much to me. Yes, rules were broken, but context matters. He acted out of compassion, not malice. Other doctors probably face similar situations but don't get caught or reported. The whole system needs better guidelines for terminal cases.Maybe there could have been a middle ground for better pain management without crossing that final line.

Posted Using INLEO

Sort:  

Yes, the doctor acted upon compassion but not everyone would understand this since it has to do with a person's life. Do you think the doctor could have recorded such a day like that as a proof? No one never knew what was coming though.

This is such a difficult topic. It's purely a personal opinion, but I think that both the doctor and the system were right. But instead of suspending his license (and losing the services of a skilled doctor), a more appropriate punishment would have been for him to be obligated to give a percentage of his wages to a cancer research charity for the next 5-10 years.

This is a debate we've been having in the UK recently, with the government pushing through an "Assisted Dying Bill". It is intended to allow doctors to provide caring euthanasia to relieve the suffering of terminal patients who ask for it.

But there are major concerns. What if a greedy relative has power of attorney and persuades a doctor to do it in order to get an inheritance ? What if a doctor makes the decision unilaterally, as already happens with the "Cambridge Pathway" currently in use - there's a scandal brewing on that, where doctors have been reportedly assessing patient's cognitive ability (a key part of making the decision on whether to put them on the pathway) after administering strong sedatives. More importantly, with the government clearly seeing pensioners as a cost to be reduced by any means possible (including increased taxes and removal of the Winter Fuel Allowance), how long before "right to die" becomes "obligation to die" ?

Yes , it's a difficult topic, and I also think the suspension of his license was too harsh, yeah, they could have done something like slashing his salary and donating.

But there are major concerns. What if a greedy relative has power of attorney and persuades a doctor to do it in order to get an inheritance ?

This also is another thing and I kinda get why that law was put in place in the first place.

there's a scandal brewing on that, where doctors have been reportedly assessing patient's cognitive ability (a key part of making the decision on whether to put them on the pathway) after administering strong sedatives. More importantly, with the government clearly seeing pensioners as a cost to be reduced by any means possible (including increased taxes and removal of the Winter Fuel Allowance), how long before "right to die" becomes "obligation to die" ?

Like seriously 😳? Wow I have no words.
I don't even know what to think anymore now.

🙆

Doc was in a really tight situation and if he had known, he would not have ended her suffering.