I am glad you could relate.
Countries taking measures to curb hate speech is not something new any longer, the issue is the manner at which those measures are taken and for the benefit of who. I mean the government can't just restrict people from accessing the internet or a specific social media platform and claim it is solely for the benefit of the people.

Or empower policies that would allow those with resources to have the legal authority of using people's free opinion against them all in the name curbing hate speech. The line becomes blurry when we are unable to differentiate between public opinion and hate speech.