You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Magic (Hive) Internet Money .:. Late Night Blogging

in Hive Learners3 years ago

...and throws the rest of the voting power in the trash bin

Didn't realise this but indeed it is a darn shame curator team votes are wasted. I guess not enough posts that can be voted for. The curator team that I see regularly voting for the funder posts, is the one with quite a bit of rules.

HBF.Funder

Don't understand why so mucho dollars on the posts whilst the account gets mucho more from the Proposal system anyway redendering the post rewards to pocket money. Better to give all such vote power to content creators and those who engage.

mini-meetup

IRL? Superrrrr... Hope you find great pleasure in those.

Sort:  

Don't understand why so mucho dollars on the posts whilst the account gets mucho more from the Proposal system anyway redendering the post rewards to pocket money. Better to give all such vote power to content creators and those who engage.

Well, nope... the opinion is that the reward pool is too big for Hivians, and that's why they are reducing it by voting for those comments...

the opinion is that the reward pool is too big for Hivians

That's the opinion of who? OCD and all?

Not too mucho posts that deserve kickass rewards/. Though still a whole bunch of users/posts under-rewarded. Something we'll - likely - never be able to balance more.

I think we had already this discussion as it dates from November...
https://peakd.com/hbd/@smooth/hbd-stabilizer-update-november-2023

I've been involved in several discussions with stakeholders who feel that the global reward pool is too large given the size of the user base and organic demand for content. The @hbd.funder comments are one way to address that, and I would encourage stakeholders who agree with the reward pool not being that efficient in helping Hive relative to the cost to vote for those comments. It is also another way to decentralize funding decisions for HBD stabilization.