You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Ecency Leaderboard Champions

in Ecency • 4 months ago

I couldn't make it to the Top 10 this week, but I'll keep working on it for next week 💪🏻😉

Also, I have a question. If someone is in the Top 10 but doesn't qualify, why don't just exclude that person and give that spot to the next person in the list? That would give the chance to the person in the 11th spot to get some rewards.

Congratulations for reaching Lucky Number 19 🎉🏆 @noemilunastorta Your prize has been sent 😊

4 months ago in Ecency by
100%
    -100%

      Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

      • Disagreement on rewards
      • Fraud or plagiarism
      • Hate speech or trolling
      • Miscategorized content or spam

      Submit
      0.00 ARCHON
        1 vote
        Reply 2
        Sort:  
      • Trending
        • [-]
         4 months ago 

        It's a good idea, but then makes all the Lucky Numbers too confusing and would take to much time to sort it all out!

        Thanks for sponsoring a Lucky Number prize!
        !INDEED

        100%
          -100%

            Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

            • Disagreement on rewards
            • Fraud or plagiarism
            • Hate speech or trolling
            • Miscategorized content or spam

            Submit
            0.00 ARCHON
              1 vote
              Reply
              [-]
               4 months ago 

              You could make changes only with the first 11 spots on the list and leave the rest as it is. Just not to make a mess haha.

              100%
                -100%

                  Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

                  • Disagreement on rewards
                  • Fraud or plagiarism
                  • Hate speech or trolling
                  • Miscategorized content or spam

                  Submit
                  0.00 ARCHON
                    Reply