MicroStrategy Admits It Might Need to Sell Bitcoin by 2026

in Paper in my Pocket2 days ago (edited)

E7FC1F4D-5A1F-4302-B8F0-054925D69D0A.png

I came across a piece the other day that talks about some of the trials Strategy could be facing as early as next year. I think many of us have seen the dangers to investing in the company, and this just highlights them.

Read the piece here: https://protos.com/microstrategy-admits-it-might-need-to-sell-bitcoin-by-2026/

Just to sum it up, because I know few of you are going to read it:

According to a recent SEC filing, Saylor’s company is now acknowledging that it may be forced to sell some of its BTC as early as next year. This is a bit shocking, considering Saylor has long been the face of corporate Bitcoin maximalism, famously declaring that “you do not sell your Bitcoin” and vowing to hold his coins until death. But... maybe that will be changing soon.

The filing outlines several scenarios that could compel Strategy to liquidate part of its holdings:

  • The company holds $8.2 billion in USD-denominated debt, and if Bitcoin’s price continues to decline, Strategy might lack sufficient cash to meet interest payments, necessitating BTC sales.
  • Obligations to preferred shareholders, including 8% and 10% dividend-yielding series, could require BTC liquidation to fulfill these commitments.
  • With Bitcoin down 19% year-to-date, the company’s profit margin on its BTC investment is under 15%, increasing financial pressure.

While Saylor’s public persona promotes unwavering confidence in Bitcoin, it’s essential to recognize that his primary role is to attract investors to his company. That is to say, his Bitcoin cheerleading serves a more self-interested purpose. This doesn't take away from his messaging. Many of us have probably watched interviews with him and agreed with everything he's said about Bitcoin, but we do need to honestly recognize that he does have an alterative reason for all his appearances promoting BTC.

Though it might be extreme to label Strategy’s approach as a Ponzi scheme, the reliance on continuous capital inflows to sustain operations bears just a little resemblance to one. You know the saying—if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck… well, it might just be a duck.

For individual investors, purchasing Bitcoin directly offers a more straightforward and potentially safer exposure to the asset. Investing in MSTR introduces additional risks, including corporate debt obligations and the potential for forced BTC sales, which could leave regular investors high and dry.

This isn't to say that MSTR doesn’t come with its upsides. If we ever do enter a bull run then market exuberance could push MSTR up much faster than BTC and higher percentage-wise, allowing for greater gains. I kind of don't think the pros are worth it, but you may disagree.

Anyway, again full article here: MicroStrategy admits it might need to sell bitcoin by 2026

Hi there! David is an American teacher and translator lost in Japan, trying to capture the beauty of this country one photo at a time and searching for the perfect haiku. He blogs here and at laspina.org. Write him on Mastodon.

【Support @dbooster with Hive SBI】

Sort:  

I don't think this is really cause for alarm. Companies and CEOs sell stocks all the time for a wide variety of reasons. It's all part of the process I think.

Yeah I'm thinking by then there'll be a lot more companies wanting some bitcoin.

Maybe, maybe not, but what's at issue is if the price of BTC dips too much, his creditors will come calling and he will have to sell BTC to pay them. That could very easily put his company in a death spiral as other investors decide they want out. Short term this would also affect the price of BTC, since MSTR is the biggest company buying it. Long term it will probably have no effect. But that's why I write it is probably safer for us to buy BTC directly and avoid MSTR.

For sure!

In most cases, yes, but with Saylor, the entire value of his company is based on his BTC buys. To raise money for his BTC buys he is offering convertible notes, basically IOUs to be cashed if the price of BTC or his company drops. All it is going to take is one domino for his entire scheme to collapse.

Ah okay. Well that could be bad then! I don't understand it all, but I trust you.

It will be a problem at some point 100%. Some of us dare say it’s gonna be what FTX was in late 2022 or what bitconnect was in 2028 or Gox was to 2014. Not due to crimes unlike others but just because it mathematically won’t work long term. His rates aren’t almost zero but with global market anxiety and what not I could see something breaking that effects everything and we could see who knows what happen liquidity wise. Maybe it takes a decade and I’m wrong on it being a key fail like other 3 examples but it just doesn’t make sense. The whole appeal to traders was it will perform better than bitcoin because leverage and that’s a dangerous game. Even with the incredible low rate he gets and it’s insanely close to zero. Doesn’t matter, it’s not going to last. People should just buy and hold. The shortcuts never work. It just has a better rep because it’s a legit platform being traded on the major USA stock Index.

Sorry for going long 🤣 tried new coffee and it’s fire 🔥 👍

I'm thinking if his business venture needs a forever pamp, its not sustainable. I may sound like a negative nancy. But, i can almost bet, the next bear, btc will bottom at 36k

That breaks the dude, he's cooked.

That's pretty much my thinking too. Mid thirties. I think if and when the US stock market pops, BTC will fall with it and crypto will be in for a winter that will be longer than any of the bears we have faced so far in its lifetime.

Unless Saylor is able to somehow create a new scheme to pay his creditors while continuing to buy BTC, he's going to be in trouble.

You received an upvote of 90% from Precious the Silver Mermaid!

Please remember to contribute great content to the #SilverGoldStackers tag to create another Precious Gem.

ah ha.. if it looks like a ponzi.. 😎✌️