Yes, they could have done that. They could also have just felt thankful that someone thought that their song was worth to cover, and thanked them even. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!HOPE
!INDEED
!PEPE
!WEIRD
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Trending
If they did such partnership, both original owner and cover artist would benefit from both popularity and revenue !INDEED, which is a win-win. 🤔🤯🤓 Some original creators seem to really not want it though. 🤯🤯
!WEIRD
!HOPE
!WINEX
Indeed, and I've noticed. Mutual benefit, and win-win dynamics, are not something they don't tend to like. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD
They have to realize first though their own benefit from such potential partnership before they engage with it. 🧘♂️
!PIXY
!ALIVE
That's true, and unfortunately many seem unaware or oblivious to such benefits. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!PIXY
Even when presented with (credible) evidence though, some people would still not accept mutual benefit partnerships !INDEED. 🧘♂️🤯
!WEIRD
!HOPE
!PIXY
!WINEX
That holds true in many areas, not just mutually-beneficial relationships on Hive, sadly. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!HOPE
!INDEED
!PIXY
!WINE
!WEIRD
Sometimes, people just need more convincing, not merely evidence to understand the benefit of something. 🤔🧘♂️🤯🤓
!HOPE
I'm really not into trying to convince anyone of anything. I'd rather work with those with whom I'm already aligned. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!BBH
!HOPE